Demartek Reports

Demartek provides real-world, hands-on research & analysis by focusing on industry analysis and lab validation testing of server, network, storage and security technologies in its ISO 17025 accredited test lab.

, President of Demartek, includes information shown here in some of his storage presentations. His public speaking schedule is also available.

If you are looking for an industry analyst who has hands-on experience with the products and technologies he speaks and writes about, please contact us.

Related Demartek Content


Sign-up for the Demartek Newsletter!

Demartek Publishes Exchange Server 2003 vs 2007 vs 2010 I/O Comparison Summary

Updated 4 May 2012

By , Demartek President

With Exchange Server 2010, Microsoft has again made several changes to the Extensible Storage Engine (ESE) to increase performance and reduce the frequency of reads and writes. Two of the major changes are to perform fewer, larger and more sequential I/O operations and to increase the page size to 32KB. These changes reduce the number of I/O operations required to access mailbox data and increase the likelihood that data can be accessed in contiguous blocks. A complete explanation of these changes is available on Microsoft TechNet, with links provided in the reference section below.

Reasons for these changes include taking advantage of the superior performance of spinning disk drives with sequential read and write operations compared to random I/O operations, larger numbers of email messages commonly sent and received per day than in the past and an effort to make Exchange Server scale down into environments with less expensive storage infrastructures, including those with JBOD storage.

Exchange Server 2010 provides a unified high availability and site resilience solution known as mailbox resiliency, that uses multiple database copies. The table below refers to the single database copy only.

We are producing deployment guides for some of the technologies described in this document.


More information

To be notified when we post new deployment guides, evaluation reports and commentaries, sign-up for our free monthly newsletter, Demartek Lab Notes. We do not give out, rent or sell our email list.


Contents


User Profiles

For Exchange Server 2010, Microsoft has eliminated the usage of the user profile terms “light”, “medium” and “heavy” to describe the estimated IOPS per mailbox and simply uses a numeric value for the average number of messages sent and received in a day. To see the old definitions for these profiles, see our older Exchange Server 2003 vs. 2007 I/O Comparison Summary page. In order to eliminate confusion and provide a side-by-side comparison of the estimated IOPS for Exchange Server 2003, 2007 and 2010, we have compiled the data provided by Microsoft for each of the three versions of Exchange Server into a single table for comparison. We have also provided some charts that help to visualize these differences.

For Exchange Server 2003, Microsoft provided user profile IOPS figures in multiples of 0.25, which result in specific numbers of messages sent and received per day. Beginning with Exchange Server 2007, Microsoft provided IOPS figures to achieve specific numbers of messages per day in multiples of 25 or 50. For Exchange Server 2010, Microsoft provided IOPS figures for higher numbers of messages per day than with previous versions of Exchange Server. Note that each successive verion of Exchange Server requires significantly fewer IOPS to achieve a particular level of daily message traffic.

The IOPS values in the table below can be used for JetStress testing for the appropriate version of JetStress.


Exchange Server 2003 vs 2007 vs 2010 Comparison Summary Table

Exchange Server 2003 Exchange Server 2007 Exchange Server 2010
(Single database copy)
Architecture 32-bit 64-bit 64-bit
Memory Usage 4GB or less up to 32GB or more up to 32GB or more
DB Read:Write ratio 3:1 ~ 2:1 ~1:1 2:3, 1:1, 3:2
DB Random I/O % 100% Random 100% Random 100% Random
DB Page Size 4KB 8KB 32KB
User Profiles
Messages per day
IOPS IOPS IOPS
25 0.11
50 0.18 0.06
70 0.50
100 0.32 0.12
105 0.75
140 1.00
150 0.48 0.18
200 0.64 0.24
210 1.50
250 0.30
300 0.36
350 0.42
400 0.48
450 0.54
500 0.60

Graphs

The Exchange Server IOPS Trends chart plots all the IOPS and messages per day data from the comparison summary table above.
Exchange Server IOPS Trends

We selected two messages per day data points, the 100 and 200 messages per day for a little closer examination because data is available for all three versions of Exchange Server in the comparison. The Exchange Server 2003 data points of 105 and 210 were close to the corresponding data points for Exchange Server 2007 and 2010, so the charts approximate this data. The data shows that it takes fewer IOPS to achieve particular numbers of messages per day for each newer version of Exchange Server as compared to the earlier versions, based on the data provided by Microsoft.
Exchange Server IOPS to Achieve Selected Activity Levels

In this next graph, we wanted to determine how many messages per day could be achieved with a particular IOPS value. We chose 0.4 and extrapolated the data, based on the figures provided by Microsoft. Each newer version of Exchange Server supports higher numbers of messages per day at a given IOPS value than for the previous versions.
Exchange Server Activity Levels Achieve at 0.4 IOPS


References

References to Microsoft TechNet for more detail:


The original version of this page is available at www.demartek.com/Demartek_Exchange_2003_2007_2010_I-O_Comparison_Summary.html on the Demartek website.